QPR have launched a Make Some Noise campaign in an attempt to improve the atmosphere at Loftus Road.
The campaign will involve flyers on every turnstile as supporters enter the stadium for Saturday’s match against Reading.
It’s fair to say the idea has not gone down well with supporters, with many on social media making their disgust clear.
What’s causing the poor atmosphere and what could change it? Here are five things that might make a positive difference.
QPR say the Make Some Noise campaign is a response to feedback given to chief executive Lee Hoos. But Hoos has flatly refused to give in to pleas to move the family stand from the lower Loft – traditionally a part of the ground populated by hardcore supporters from which much of the atmosphere was generated.
Moving families from this area would be problematic for a number of reasons. Where would they go? And which season ticket holders would potentially have to make way for them? Hoos is also a numbers man, and the numbers tell him the family stand is in the right place.
But where there’s a will there’s a way, and there ought to be a will to reverse what was a stupid decision that has inevitably affected the atmosphere and will continue to do so.
QPR have been prepared to put noses out of joint in the past, not least when regulars were unceremoniously turfed out of the South Africa Road stand to make room for a larger directors’ and VIP area, where there are often plenty of empty seats.
Admittedly that happened during the Flavio Briatore era, but more recently fans in the Ellerslie Road stand were affected by extra media facilities QPR had to add. Disabled fans have also had a raw deal at Rangers and improving their experience has required change.
Rangers, like all clubs, are prepared to make tough decisions when it suits them.
You can be certain that if the proposed relocation to Old Oak happens, or, even more so, if it doesn’t and alternative options are then mooted, some fans will be deeply unhappy with the vision set out by QPR’s owners, who will be more than prepared to make their case for what they’ll argue is the greater good. Compared to that, moving the family stand is nothing.
The aim of any club should be to attract and retain young fans. For decades, prior to the lower Loft being turned into a half-empty family area, the club attracted and retained solid support largely because of the Loftus Road experience.
That experience is now relatively poor, so preserving the current set-up based on numbers is short-sighted and irresponsible. Less important than where young fans sit at Loftus Road is what kind of Loftus Road they come to know.
The Loft is QPR tradition. A more worthwhile campaign would be to restore it and fill it.
Many Rangers fans argue that the reason for the poor atmosphere is very simple: the football’s rubbish.
Allied to this is the strong belief that Jimmy Floyd Hasselbaink isn’t adventurous enough and ought to adopt a more attacking approach – namely with two up front.
From a tactical perspective, this theory has more holes than a piece of Swiss cheese in a colander. There are good reasons why successive QPR managers before Hasselbaink, and managers in general, haven’t played with two out and out strikers either.
Tjaronn Chery, arguably Rangers’ best and most influential player, plays in the number 10 role, and the idea that Rangers could play with a 4-4-2 (in which many apparently would select the permanently unfit and uncommitted Sandro in central midfield) and be better for it just doesn’t stack up.
It’s not 1985. The days of wingers running down the wing and slinging crosses towards a couple of strikers are generally gone – because it’s easy to defend against.
Playing that way would arguably get Rangers nowhere in the long run. But what it might do, initially at least, is get the crowd going, create a bit of a spark around the place from which the players might feed off. And after that, who knows?
Much has been made of QPR’s frequent manager changes. But there has been continuity in the sense that for around half of the last 25 years the manager has been Gerry Francis, Ian Holloway or Neil Warnock. This has been hugely significant in terms of shaping attitudes.
All three managers were major personalities, excellent with the media, and most importantly they knew exactly what buttons to push when it came to getting the fans on side.
This helped them create a sense of pride and togetherness in which fans were engaged and rallied behind a cause. This was reflected in their teams, which contained characters who remain fondly remembered by supporters.
That has made it very difficult for more considered, introverted managers to be accepted. They’re perceived as dull and uninspiring. And when that perception kicks in, a malaise hangs over the place.
Holloway helped generate a superb atmosphere at Loftus Road
QPR’s history over the last few decades does not bode well for a lower-key personality like Hasselbaink. Managers in his mould have generally been unable to galvanise the club.
With the possible exception of Sebastian Polter, his team also lacks players with the personality to do it for him. It’s all very stale at the moment.
Forget tactics. Hasselbaink’s best bet this week would be to have a dig at Reading about shamelessly copying QPR’s kit, and on Saturday pick a fight with a linesman – anything to lift that malaise and get the place going.
Obviously.
After the foolhardy spending, Rangers are in transition and this was always going to be a difficult couple of years as the club is reshaped.
The average age of their recent signings, plus a desire to bring through youngsters, means it will take time for characters to develop and for the team to find some momentum, and in turn excite the fans and generate an atmosphere. It might just be a case of waiting.
‘Make some noise’ isn’t the best slogan ever and has opened Rangers up to some deserved ridicule.
‘Welcome to Loftus Road. We’re trying to build for the future but the next couple of years are likely to be like pulling teeth at times’ wouldn’t fit the bill – or the flyer.
But it would probably be the most honest portrayal of where Rangers are right now.
This post was last modified on 12/10/2016
View Comments
Drop Karl Henry and all will be fine
Neil - I'm more concerned with JFH picking the team best suited to winning games of football....not tailoring the formation to fit one player in it, as good as he is. He's currently playing Chery out of position anyway, so your argument that 442 can't include him is a moot point.The problem that we have is that our defensive / holding midfielders (namely Cousins and Henry) simply aren't good enough at their jobs, not that the formation itself doesn't work in modern football - if you can't keep hold of the ball in midfield and are constantly chasing after the opposition, you will invariably end up being over-run as a game progresses anyway. Besides, what happened to this high intensity pressing style which Hasselbaink eulogised about when he took over? If we actually did adopt that approach and played with 2 strikers who closed down the opposition back four, you would take a lot of the pressure off of the midfield to begin with.
It's a bit rich,asking the crowd to make more noise,the solution is very simple,Give them something to shout about.We the supporters have stuck with the team for many years through thick and THIN,so please lay the problem at the proper feet.The management and administration of our club over a number of years has been chaotic at best and the one constant has always been the supporters.
You simply can't play 4-4-2 and fit the Rs most creative player in the side, there's no room for Chery in a 4-4-2 formation you couldn't play him in midfield with 1 other you would get totally over run.
"It’s not 1985. The days of wingers running down the wing and slinging crosses towards a couple of strikers are generally gone – because it’s easy to defend against."
Tell that to Sean Dyche. He achieved 2 promotions in 3 seasons out of the Championship doing exactly that. There isn't some secret to getting out of this division that we don't know about. Look at every side (not including us) over the last couple of years who has either won the league or gone up automatically...Burnley, Boro, Watford, Bourenmouth - How many of them went the season playing one up front at home? The answer, of course, is none. The success of all of those sides was built on playing two strikers virtually week in, week out....So to say 442 or two up front in particular 'doesn't work anymore' simply has no basis in fact or recent history. It also makes me wonder why JFH signed the likes of Ngabakoto, Wszolek and El Khayeti. He's signed wingers to play that style, and then goes with one up top. Play direct, attacking football in the Championship and you will win many more games than you lose. The crowd making a bit of noise would also be a nice bonus.